
December 2007
EMPLOYEE OR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR?
A common scenario many business owners face is hiring an independent contractor, who operates as a sole proprietor, for a task where the possibility for injury exists. Yet, you fail to obtain Workers Compensation coverage for this person because you assume if they were injured on the job, their independent contractor status would prohibit a claim against your insurance.
What you may not realize, however, is that just because someone is a sole proprietor of a business doesn’t automatically make them an independent contractor if they come to work for you. They may very well be considered an employee.
Determining whether someone is an employee or independent contractor is complicated by the fact that three separate agencies, your state Workers Compensation Board, your state Department of Labor, and the IRS, each make a determination of status based on their own criteria. The IRS requirements can be found online at http://www.irs.gov. You can obtain state requirements by contacting your local Workers Compensation Board and Department of Labor office.
In spite of all of this seeming confusion, there are general rules of thumb you can utilize to determine if a worker should be considered an employee. The commonality among these criteria is that the employer directly controls the how, what, and when of the worker’s employment.
Direct Evidence of the Right to Control
Method of Payment
Furnishing of Equipment
Right to Terminate Relationship without Liability
The general criteria for determining whether a worker should be considered an independent contractor or employee are as follows:
Remember, a worker’s status is subject to the particulars of the specific work to be performed. While someone may qualify as an independent contractor for one assignment, they may become an employee for the next job. Therefore, you must always re-evaluate the worker’s status on regular basis to ensure compliance.