Skip to main content
All Posts By

robintek

NEED MORE INSURANCE TO COVER YOUR FINE ART?

By Personal Perspective

Many people collect paintings, sculptures, antiques, and other works of art with values ranging from garage sale prices to thousands of dollars. The International Risk Management Institute states that art becomes valuable for one of three reasons: Cultural significance; owner’s subjective value; or the marketplace’s estimate of its worth. Regardless of the reason, damage to a valuable work of art will likely cause the owner significant financial loss.

A standard Homeowners insurance policy provides some coverage for fine art, but is unsuitable for high-priced works. The insurance company will pay for losses to art caused by fire, water damage, vandalism, theft, and a limited number of other causes. In the event of a loss, the company will pay the item’s replacement cost after subtracting depreciation. For example, if fire destroyed a painting worth $1,000 on the open market, the Homeowners policy would pay the cost of replacing the canvas, paint and frame after subtracting some amount to reflect the age of those materials. This amount might be nowhere close to the work’s market value.

For this reason, art owners might want to buy separate insurance on their fine arts. This insurance can be in the form of an addition (also called an endorsement) to the Homeowners policy, or via a separate policy (sometimes called a “fine arts floater”). A fine arts floater insures paintings and drawings; art glass windows; valuable rugs, statues, furniture, and books; and “other bona fide works of rarity, historical value or artistic merit.” These items must be in a private collection owned by the policyholder; there is no coverage for works owned by a museum, business or government agency. The policy lists high-value art works individually on the policy with their associated coverage amounts and shows a combined insurance limit for all lower-value pieces. If the policyholder buys a new piece during the policy period, the policy provides automatic coverage for 90 days. The most it will pay for a new piece (until the owner reports it to the company) is 25% of the amount of insurance covering items specifically listed on the policy.

If the owner plans to transport an artwork from the address shown on the policy, coverage will apply only if competent packers handle the move. Coverage does not apply to a piece while it is in the custody of an art dealer, museum or auction house if the entity has insurance covering it. Also, the policy will not pay for damage to pieces while they’re on exhibition off the owner’s premises; the owner can extend coverage off-premises by adding the address of the exhibition to the policy.

The policy covers damage to fine arts from all causes except:

  • Actions of governmental or civil authorities
  • Intentional damage
  • Neglect
  • Repair, restoration, or retouching processes
  • Breakage of glass, statues, and other fragile articles unless fire, explosion, collision, windstorm, earthquake, flood, malicious mischief, or theft caused the loss. For an additional premium, the company may remove this limitation.

In the event of a loss, the company will pay the amount shown on the policy for items specifically listed on the policy. For other pieces, it will pay amounts equal to their replacement cost minus depreciation, up to a maximum of $500 per item.

To accurately determine an item’s value, the insurance company may require an expert appraisal. It may also require the policyholder to take certain precautions to safeguard especially valuable pieces. One of our qualified insurance agents can give advice on appropriate coverage and companies. Anyone who owns these treasures should make certain the right insurance is in place. Contact us today!

EXERCISE CAUTION TO AVOID TRAFFIC CAMERA TICKETS

By Personal Perspective

Rushing to make it to work on time, Bill sees the traffic light up ahead turn yellow. He speeds up to make it through the intersection, but the light changes to red before he makes it to the other side. When he doesn’t see any flashing blue lights tailing him, Bill breathes a sigh of relief assuming he didn’t get caught — or so he thought.

A week later, Bill is shocked to receive a ticket for $150 in the mail. As he dashed through the red light a week before, a small camera at the traffic light snapped a picture of his car and license plate number. The Department of Transportation then tracked down Bill as the registered owner of the car and mailed the ticket to his home address.

Say cheese!

As more cities install red light and speeding cameras, tickets by mail (like the one Bill received) are becoming increasingly common. Obviously, drivers are never thrilled to receive a speeding or traffic violation ticket for $100 or more in the mail. Some argue the cameras are an invasion of their privacy while others complain that local police departments are just looking for a quick and easy way to boost their budgets.

Despite these protests, traffic violation cameras aren’t going away any time soon. Such cameras are skyrocketing in popularity nationwide. From San Diego, California to Atlanta, Georgia to Scottsdale, Arizona, cities are activating these red light/speeding cameras. Traffic camera fines range anywhere from $100 to $500 or more.

Cities with traffic cameras enjoy a phenomenal return on their investment. As a matter of fact, red light/speed cameras in Cleveland, Ohio caught more than 2,300 traffic violators within the first month of operation. Each Cleveland red light violator was charged $100 per citation, while speeders were fined between $150 and $200.

Unfair violations

Many drivers complain that these red light and speeding cameras can lead to unfair tickets. For example, let’s say you let your sister borrow your car. If a camera snaps her running a red light, the ticket will be mailed to you because you are the registered owner.

Some states, like Georgia, give drivers a chance to contest the ticket if the owner was not driving the car when the violation occurred. However, other states say the owner of the car is responsible for paying the ticket regardless of who was driving their car.

An uptick in accidents

Some research shows that red light and speeding cameras may lead to more traffic accidents. A 2008 study by the University of South Florida’s College of Public Health revealed red light cameras significantly increase crashes. This could be because drivers are stopping abruptly at intersections when the light turns yellow in fear that they will receive a camera violation. With so many cars slamming on the brakes at intersections where cameras are present, many cities have seen a sharp rise in rear-end collisions.

Studies from North Carolina, Virginia, and Ontario have also reported cameras are linked with increases in car crashes, including accidents involving injuries. A study by the Virginia Transportation Research Council also found that cameras were associated with higher crash costs.

However, while rear-end collisions have increased in some areas, studies show that more serious side-impact crashes have decreased due to fewer drivers running red lights.

Driving up insurance rates?

Many drivers worry that these camera tickets will lead to higher Auto insurance premiums. However, because red light and speeding camera tickets are considered civil penalties, they should not result in points on your driver’s license or have an impact on your insurance rates. However, if you rear-end a driver who slams on their brakes at a camera-monitored intersection, you probably will see a hike in your Auto insurance premiums.

REASONS TO CONSIDER UMBRELLA INSURANCE

By Personal Perspective

Umbrella insurance policies can be an important feature of personal financial plans. They provide additional insurance that takes over when a claim uses up all of a Homeowners or Auto insurance coverage. They even cover some losses that Home and Auto insurance do not cover, though the policyholder must pay a small deductible for them. They provide insurance amounts as low as $1 million and can provide $5 million or more. Despite the large amounts, they are not just for wealthy people. Here are five (actually six) situations where Umbrella policies are vital:

  • Auto insurance: A man is late for work and speeding on the highway. He loses control on icy pavement and strikes another car in the driver’s side. The other driver suffers serious injuries. Hospitalization, follow-up care, medicine, rehabilitation and pain and suffering tally up to $900,000. The at-fault driver has an Auto insurance policy that covers $250,000 for injuries to any one person. If he has an Umbrella with a $1 million limit, it will pay the remaining $650,000.
  • Bonus Auto insurance scenario, based on a true story: The policyholder’s son loses control on a highway overpass. His car plunges off the overpass and lands on a row of vehicles for sale in a Lexus dealer’s lot. Six vehicles are damaged to the tune of $150,000. His father’s Auto insurance covers $100,000 in property damage from any one accident. If he has an Umbrella, it will pay the remaining $50,000.
  • Homeowners insurance: A homeowner has insurance that covers her liability for bodily injuries to others, up to $300,000 per accident. A neighbor who has three children under age 10 drowns in her swimming pool. His estate sues her for $1.5 million. Her Homeowners insurance will pay $300,000; if she doesn’t have an Umbrella, she is responsible for the remaining $1.2 million.
  • Boats: A man has a Boat insurance policy that covers his liability for injuries to others up to $300,000 and an Umbrella policy with a $2 million limit. He loans his boat to a friend for the weekend. The friend takes it out on a lake with three buddies and a case of beer. He becomes intoxicated and plows into another boat late at night. The survivors and the estates of the deceased sue the driver and the boat owner. The court finds the owner 20% liable for the $5 million judgment. His boat policy pays $300,000 and his Umbrella pays $700,000.
  • All-terrain vehicles: A man’s grandson from out of state visits him for the holidays. He takes the boy out for a spin on the ATV he bought the week before, but the boy bounces off and suffers critical injuries. The man bought coverage for the ATV under his Auto policy, but the most it will pay is $100,000. The boy’s medical care will cost $750,000. His grandfather’s Umbrella policy will pay $650,000.
  • Personal injury: A woman loudly repeats a rumor she heard about one of her neighbors. The neighbor sues her for defamation of character and wins $500,000. The woman’s Homeowners insurance does not cover defamation, but her $1 million Umbrella does. After she pays a $250 deductible her Umbrella pays the rest.

Severe accidents like these can and do happen to people every day. When something like this happens, an Umbrella policy might be all there is to keep the person responsible from financial ruin. One of our insurance agents can explain coverage details and provide estimates of the cost. The relatively low cost could be well worth the peace of mind should a catastrophic accident occur.

SIMPLE STEPS TO PROTECT YOUR COMPANY FROM NUISANCE LAWSUITS

By Business Protection Bulletin

A March 2007 study from the Pacific Research Institute titled Jackpot Justice: The True Cost of America’s Tort System, stated that lawsuits in the U.S. cost the American public an estimated $865 billion per year. Much of this litigation was needless or stemmed from nuisance lawsuits which largely could have been avoided. In these litigious times, business owners need to sit down and analyze their risk exposure.

Here are six proactive steps that every business owner can implement to reduce their liability resulting from nuisance lawsuits:

  • Form an asset protection plan by designing a list of all the potential assets you stand to lose from a lawsuit. Take a hard look at your current insurance coverage. Make a point to sit down with both your insurance agent and lawyer to limit your exposure from both an insurance and legal perspective.
  • Separate your personal assets from business assets by setting up a C or S corporation or else consider a Limited Liability partnership or even a Limited Liability company. Although this action does nothing to limit lawsuits, you might be able to remove your personal assets from a lawsuit settlement. Consider setting up a qualified retirement plan as federal laws offer protection from creditors for such accounts. However, remember that some states might not include IRAs so seek qualified advice.
  • Purchase the right Liability insurance for your business as this can be the best investment you can make. Seriously consider buying Excess or Umbrella coverage as you can easily get an additional $1million coverage for a very inexpensive rate. Today, almost every business that has employees should consider Employment Practices Liability Coverage (EPL) This form of insurance covers current employees, past employees, potential employees, customers or clients from employment related civil actions of discrimination such as gender, age, race or disability, sexual harassment litigation, wrongful dismissal actions, breach of contract, retaliation and other claims brought against your company. Due to the significant rise in such claims, this relatively new insurance coverage has taken on significant importance for companies of any size in recent years. Be sure to contact us about these and other coverages for your company.
  • Form your own risk management plan to eliminate unnecessary risk in your workplace. Be proactive in the house cleaning for your company and eliminate hazards by performing repairs or maintenance as they arise. Instill strict and enforceable policies to protect the safety of workers and the public from harmful situations that can quickly translate into a needless lawsuit.
  • Specify your policies to clarify everything and anything that could result in a lawsuit. An employee handbook should be issued to all staff. Have them read the handbook before they start work and sign an appropriate form stating they have read and understand the material. Ensure any policies directed to your customers or general public are clearly visible and explicit. Incorporate your customer policies in all your promotional material. Don’t trip yourself up by making promises which can’t be kept. Train all your staff so they clearly understand any policies that apply to customers or other relevant third parties.
  • Consider taping phone conversations so you have a record of what your caller is inquiring or complaining about. This also provides you with a record of how staff are responding to the caller. Remember that if you decide to take this approach, you must initiate the call with a notice that the call is being recorded. Clear this with your legal advisor first.

These are but a few simple steps that any company can take to reduce their liability exposure from a host of costly nuisance lawsuits.

LEARN THE ESSENTIALS OF A SOLID EMPLOYEE BACKGROUND CHECK

By Business Protection Bulletin

Employment background checks are not just for high tech companies or executive level management any more. A thorough background check should be performed to avoid making any assumptions about an employee’s history.

To help you get started, here are some essentials of a complete background check:

Current address – Confirm a current address through a telephone directory, confirmation with landlord, rental or mortgage company, or county tax office.

Former addresses – Confirm former addresses through former employers, credit agencies, or by contacting the landlords of former residences. If the applicant resided in another city, state or country, you might use an investigative agency to perform some standard verification.

Other detailed information you might choose to verify is the amount of rent or mortgage paid, whether it was paid on time, details of complaints made against the applicant, whether their former residence was left in good order when vacated, whether they left on their own accord, and any eviction details, if applicable.

Current and Former Employers – Employers are reticent about providing too much information on current or former employees since negative references occasionally result in lawsuits. Most employers, however, will verify an employee’s job title, length of employment, starting and final salary, and reason for leaving. You might obtain resume data on old application forms to compare with the resume or application of the person you are considering for the position.

A more detailed background check might include obtaining the names of the applicant’s immediate supervisor or manager and trying to establish contact with them. Interviews can be conducted by phone or in person. Since there is a fine line regarding invasion of privacy, obtain the applicant’s permission in writing if necessary. Protect your liability exposure by discussing the legality of the background check with your company’s lawyer beforehand.

Education – Transcripts from most secondary institutions can usually only be obtained either by the applicant themselves or through a signed release that includes enrollment dates, department and subject of study or major, student identification number or social security number, and date of birth. A photocopy of the degree or certificate should be obtained for verification, if possible. Contact the applicable registrar’s office and they will be able to specify what is required to release information.

Additionally, verify the college is legitimate. Fake diploma mills offer degrees from fictitious institutions possessing names very similar to known established educational institutes, so do not assume you recognize the name.

Credit Check – A credit check is usually required in those situations where the position involves security, fiduciary responsibility, or bonding. Verify that all information provided in the credit check conforms to the information provided on the application. Poor credit references should be cross referenced and authenticated for accuracy.

References – All personal references listed by the applicant should be contacted. If it is a basic employment check, the integrity of the applicant’s personal character can be established by phone. Detailed checks might necessitate personal contact to meet with the references face to face, as the references given might provide information prejudicial in favor of the applicant.

Miscellaneous – Additional items which could be of relevance include a criminal records check performed in all states listed on the application form, driver’s abstracts and records check on civil suits.

Be methodical and take the time to perform a thorough back ground check that satisfies the need of your business.

HANDLE LAYOFFS WITH CARE TO AVOID LAWSUITS

By Business Protection Bulletin

With the U.S. economy in recession, companies are trying to make up for declining sales by reducing expenses. Workforce reductions, though they might improve short-run profits, could also cause long-term problems if the firm does not handle them with care. Angry former employees could look for justification for legal action. The employees who remain will take on extra work with no additional compensation, while they deal emotionally with the loss of colleagues and fear that the job cutting will eventually hit them. Consequently, companies must approach layoffs with caution.

The company must first determine whether a layoff is the best option. Although it might reduce costs quickly, it could also cause the company to dismiss valuable workers. This will hurt long-term productivity, lower the morale of the survivors, and wipe out valuable institutional knowledge. There is also a risk that a layoff will affect older or minority workers unfairly, which could lead to discrimination complaints. Therefore, the company should look at alternatives such as hiring and wage freezes, adjustments to employee benefits, not replacing workers who leave or retire, and job sharing.

If the company decides that it must reduce its workforce, several careful steps are required:

  • Establish a specific goal for the layoff to achieve, such as a dollar amount of savings or number of positions.
  • Identify those job functions and skills that it will need to operate successfully after the layoff.
  • Set a timetable so that the reduction has a clear end.
  • Comply with federal and state labor laws.
  • Determine which jobs are unnecessary and eliminate them.

When determining which employees to dismiss, the company may legally use criteria such as length of service with the company, the necessity of a certain job classification, employee status (i.e., part-time or temporary), or employees’ performance records. Management should review candidates for dismissal to ensure that the cutback does not disproportionately impact classes of employees protected by law. If managers can find no other compelling business reason for terminating those employees, they must seek out alternatives.

Once managers have made selections and the decision to proceed, they must inform the affected workers in a professional manner. They should be able to explain clearly the reasons for the action; workers’ entitlement to benefits such as severance, health coverage, and others; and post-employment services available to the workers, such as outplacement. The workers might express emotions ranging from stunned silence to rage; the managers must be prepared to deal with their reactions in a businesslike manner. Remaining employees will have concerns about their own futures and the firm’s outlook. Management should, to the extent possible, explain the reasons for the layoff, the likelihood of additional job cuts, and the business goals the firm seeks to achieve through the layoffs.

The company must take particular care when the layoff involves older employees. Severance packages usually require the employee to waive his right to press a claim under federal law. However, regulations impose procedural requirements that an employer must meet before a court will consider the waivers valid. Companies must take special care to meet those requirements.

Shrinking a company is an unpleasant prospect that no manager relishes. Employee lawsuits might well result from a workforce reduction. However, if the firm handles the action with care and sensitivity, it can make such claims less likely and will be in a better position to defend itself against claims that do arise.

LOOK FOR RED FLAGS TO SPOT WORKERS COMP FRAUD

By Construction Insurance Bulletin

Spotting the red flags that indicate possible Workers Compensation fraud by employees is the best way to prevent fraud from occurring. Knowing how to spot the red flags is a proactive way to nip a potentially costly but false Workers Compensation claim before it begins.

Most instances of Workers Compensation fraud occur when the claimant:

  • Deliberately falsifies information about how an injury occurred, such as claiming the injury was work-related when it was not.
  • Deliberately amplifies the seriousness of an injury to falsely prolong the claim.
  • Deliberately continues to collect entitlements while working on the sly for their own purposes or with another employer.

Common Signs of Workers Compensation Fraud

  • Lack of witnesses – The majority of people claiming false work-related injuries usually do not have witnesses to support their claim. Vigilance is especially necessary when the employee normally works with other co-workers who should have witnessed the injury but did not.
  • Contradictory accounts of how the injury occurred – This can be particularly blatant when any of the doctor’s, employer’s, or witnesses’ reports contradict the employee’s report of the incident. Another red flag should be raised when the employee is deliberately vague about how the injury occurred.
  • Dissatisfied employees – Unhappy employees can be motivated to make a false Workers Compensation claim, especially if a recent incident such as a reprimand, changed responsibilities, or a possible demotion has occurred.
  • Time occurrence of the injury – Many false Workers Compensation claims are submitted before a potential strike, project conclusion, strike, or possible layoff. Many false claims also happen to be submitted on either a Friday or a Monday.
  • Inconsistent injury – The nature and extent of the injury is not consistent with their duties or type of job performed.
  • Inconsistent reporting procedures – Occurs when there is an inexplicable gap between when the injury occurred and when the employee reported the injury. Be alert if crucial injury data is absent, such as no definite time reported when the injury happened or if other vital dates are absent.
  • Lack of contact – The employee cannot be contacted easily by the claims rep or employer. Continuous lack of contact could indicate that the employee is working elsewhere while receiving ongoing entitlements. Another red flag should be raised when the employee immediately moves to another state or foreign destination after going on Workers Compensation.
  • Lack of cooperation – The employee deliberately delays or avoids medical treatment or medical diagnostics needed to clarify the medical condition of the employee’s alleged injury.
  • Physical signs – The employee exhibits physical signs of working such as dirt or grease on their hands or fingernails, work clothes that exhibit traces of work, or scrapes or bruises.
  • Newer employee – From a statistics vantage, new employees are more likely to commit Workers Compensation fraud than senior employees. The most proactive means to counter this is to screen carefully all new employees in the hiring process beforehand.

Although red flags can help minimize potential Workers Compensation losses from fraud, your best strategies to counter these problems should include:

  • Implement a Zero Tolerance policy for Workers Compensation fraud and be sure your employees know about it.
  • Take a hands-on approach with all Workers Compensation claims and become especially vigilant when red flags appear.
  • Keep in regular communication with your injured employee.
  • Have a consistent new employee screening process. Offer new employees a thorough orientation and communicate a comprehensive explanation of the Workers Compensation process together with the employee’s rights and responsibilities.

Fraudulent Workers Compensation claims are a severe drag on the costs of any business. By being aware of how to spot potential problems and being proactive at the outset can help you reduce Workers Compensation fraud in the workplace. Call one of our Comp specialists today for more information.

DOES CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY COVERAGE MEAN ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE?

By Construction Insurance Bulletin

Construction contracts usually include many provisions aimed toward transferring legal liability from one party to another. In an agreement between a general contractor and a subcontractor, the sub assumes the general’s liability. The contract does this by inserting an indemnity agreement (also known as a hold harmless agreement) into the contract’s terms. The contract may also require the sub to have the general named as an additional insured on its General Liability insurance policy. Though not all contracts do this, it is a mistake for either contractor to assume that the insurance company will provide the same protection to the general without an additional insured endorsement to the policy

The standard Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage Form specifically excludes coverage for liability that the insured assumes is in a contract. However, it adds coverage back if the contract is an “insured contract,” as the policy defines the term. The policy’s definition includes hold harmless agreements where the insured assumes another’s tort liability. That would appear to take care of the sub’s obligations under the contract, but it is not the whole story. The coverage may still contain a potentially large gap for the general.

It is important to keep in mind that in any Liability insurance claim scenario, the parties fall into three categories: Insurance company; insured; and claimant. A claim may involve multiple insureds, multiple claimants, and even multiple insurance companies, but all parties will fall into one of the three categories. If a party is not an insurance company and is not an insured by virtue of an additional insured endorsement, then it must be a claimant. Therefore, a general contractor in this situation becomes a claimant, together with all other claimants seeking damages.

Although the general could receive the same recovery for damages that it might have received as an additional insured, it might not fare as well regarding the cost of its legal defense. The CGL policy pays for defense costs incurred by anyone who is an insured under the policy, and coverage for those costs is in addition to the policy limits. If the policy has a limit of $1 million per occurrence and an insured is found liable for $1 million and runs up $500,000 in defense costs, the policy pays for both in full. As a claimant, however, the general can recover defense costs only if the hold harmless agreement with the sub required the sub to indemnify it for defense costs.

Also, it is likely that coverage for those costs will not be in addition to the policy limits. The ISO CGL policy provides defense in addition to the limits for the general only if all of the following conditions are met:

  • The sub assumed the general’s liability in an insured contract.
  • The policy covers the loss.
  • The sub assumed the general’s defense costs in the contract.
  • There is no conflict of interest between the general and the sub.
  • Both parties ask the company to control and conduct the defense and both agree to the same counsel for defense.
  • The general agrees in writing to cooperate with the insurance company in the settlement of the claim.

If any one of these conditions is not met, the company will pay the general’s defense costs only until the claim exhausts the insurance limits.

Coverage for defense costs is one of the most important benefits of being named as an additional insured on another entity’s liability insurance. An entity that needs this coverage should require the other contractor to provide the additional insured endorsement. Relying on the contractor’s contractual liability coverage is a major financial gamble. Call us today to sort through your specific liability requirements.

PROTECT YOUR COMPANY WHEN EMPLOYEES DRIVE PERSONAL VEHICLES FOR BUSINESS-RELATED PURPOSES

By Construction Insurance Bulletin

If an accident occurs while an employee or volunteer is operating their personal vehicle for company business, your company could be held liable. Even when an employee is just running an errand, such as making a bank deposit, dropping off a proposal, or picking up a part, if an accident occurs your company could suffer as a result.

Although you cannot insure a non-owned vehicle, there are other steps you can take to protect your company before a loss occurs. If your employees or volunteers use personal vehicles for company business, even if just occasionally, the following guidelines can help reduce your risk:

  • Determine a minimum level of Auto Liability insurance your employees and/or volunteers must carry. Also consider what documentation should be provided to your company to demonstrate that proper insurance coverage is in effect. For example, you might require that employees or volunteers submit a certificate of insurance each year that verifies coverage limits.
  • Driving records should be checked prior to an employee’s hiring. Validate driving credentials and check for accidents and moving violations during the past five years. All recruiters, managers and human resource people should be aware of this policy.
  • Avoid having youthful drivers, those with little driving experience, or drivers with more than one moving violation or accident use their vehicle for business-related purposes.
  • Periodically check driving records for new offenses and moving violations. Introduce a procedure for how discovery of new offenses will be handled.
  • Develop a written policy on business use of personal vehicles and communicate to all employees. Managers, human resource personnel and recruiters should share this information with any potential new hires.
  • Be sure you remain in compliance with local, state and federal statutes while obtaining private information about your employees.

Insurance can play a role in helping to protect your business from this exposure. Non-Owned Auto Liability insurance may be obtained on a stand-alone basis or in conjunction with your General Liability coverage. Coverage for hired vehicles might also be available, if needed.

Insurance premiums for Non-Owned Automobile Liability depend on the frequency of personal vehicle use and how employees use their vehicles for your business. Premiums for this line of coverage are generally fairly reasonable.

Another way to reduce risk is to eliminate the exposure. If employees or volunteers are prohibited from using their personal vehicles for business-related purposes, it eliminates the possibility of an accident that will affect your company.

In the meantime, while you are mapping out your risk reduction strategy, maybe you should consider making that bank deposit yourself.

USE EYE PROTECTION AND TRAINING TO REDUCE EYE INJURIES

By Workplace Safety

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) estimates that up to 1,000 occupational eye injuries occur every day in the U.S. workplace. This costs American employers roughly $300 million a year in Workers Compensation claims, production loss, and medical expenses.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in a 1980 survey that three out of five workers who sustained an injury were not wearing personal eye protection when the injury occurred. Another 40% of workers injured were wearing some eye protection, such as protective eyeglasses, that did not include a side shield. The BLS survey also revealed that roughly 70% of eye injuries resulted from flying particles or sparks. Exposure to chemicals accounted for another 20% of eye injuries.

It is estimated that more than 90% of all eye injuries could have been avoided with the use of the appropriate eye protection.

Simple Steps to Reduce Eye Injuries

Reducing eye injuries in the workplace is a relatively simple matter. Here are some suggestions and ideas that you as an employer and worker can employ to reduce damage to this very precious sensory organ:

  • Know the Dangers — Every employer should conduct a hazard assessment of their workplace. Hazards vary from minor dust, high impact particles to chemical splashes. It is not enough to provide eye protection; it is equally important to supply the right eye protection to suit the employment circumstances.
  • Train Your Workers — Many workers simply don’t bother with wearing any eye protection at all. Almost half of injured workers said their employer neglected to tell them when to wear eye protection let alone the correct type of eye protection. By taking the time to educate your workers on the dangers posed in their jobs and enforcing protective measures, you can dramatically reduce unnecessary and avoidable eye injuries.

Using the Correct Eye Protection

Different jobs and trades require different eye protection. Here is a brief description of available eye protection:

  • Safety Glasses which have side guards offer the least amount of protection. They are best used in minimal exposure areas with low amounts of dust, or limited exposure to flying chips or particles. There are different types available ranging from glass to plastic, but the latter is not very scratch resistant.
  • Goggles/Glasses Hybrid offer superior protection from the affects of dust or impact particles because they possess a seal of either rubber or foam which prevents particulates from otherwise breeching exposed eyes. Workers who wear prescription eyeglasses which have non-safety lens are best advised to wear goggles.
  • Face Shield Protection provides additional protection to the face and is especially valuable in guarding the entire face against chemical splashes, particles and chips. Face shields do NOT provide primary protection against eye injuries. They should almost always be used in conjunction with either goggles or safety glasses.
  • Filtered Helmets or Goggles are best used when working with either laser or welding equipment. As many of these workers will need to lift these protective helmets frequently, it is also recommended that they be wearing either goggles or safety glasses to avoid eye damage from nearby workers such as grinders for example.

Preventing costly and needless eye injuries can easily be achieved simply by taking a little extra care and time to spot the dangers, educating your employees, and providing the right eye protection to suit the job.